okay so the skinny jeans didn't work out for me so well …

Posts Tagged ‘Linux


Check out my recently published content on AC:

Becoming a Technological Apologist

They’re good people really.  They probably dropped out of school and entered the workforce sometime in the early nineties and got a great job and never looked back.  Some go on to build large corporations out of small businesses that were just a hobby, others never even majored in anything remotely IT related.  If you don’t know anything yourself, they’re easy to talk to and seem as though they know how to get the job done.


Check out my recently published content on AC:

Will it Finally Happen?

We’ve heard these arguments before; Linux will finally gain more than 1% adoption in the American market and make some serious inroads towards Windows. But so far it isn’t happened because outside of Canonical no one is serious about making a real business proposition out of Linux on the desktop. The Enterprise is another story; sure there are entire corporations using Linux, most if not all of the servers are running Linux, and so on and so forth. But the desktop has been an afterthought, which is a big part of why Ubuntu is as prevalent in that space now as compared to other vendors.

Tags: ,

Finally, IBM is getting their act together and using some of the top Linux distributors to bring their own software to the table.  This is good for everyone, particularly Microsoft, who hasn’t really been put to task to develop a better office productivity software since they took over from the Corel Wordperfect days. 

It will also be good for Sun, whom now has the leading open source alternative to Office but is hard pressed to truly improve on that product.  The IBM product is already being used in some companies on the Windows desktop alongside Office anyway.  This also proves that the real way to beat Microsoft isn’t necessarily through Linux itself, but on it’s own desktop as people who are willing to try out open source software on Windows may not be ready to take the leap into Linux and completely go open source.

If anything right now it looks as though IBM’s commitment to Linux may finally pay off in ways that are more tangible to end users and less enterprise focused.  It also suggests that open source may have to play nicely with Windows for some time before Linux or another variant can make a real dent in their user base.  Now let’s hope that IBM gets the word out to the public and disseminates discs where the public can see them and advertise as well to truly get the word out, because word of mouth alone will not accomplish this enormous task that they have ahead of themselves.


Okay by now it is apparently obvious that Apple will never replace Microsoft’s share on the desktop because of their proprietary hardware agreements.  There are illegitimate solutions, like Pystar, but no serious push to allow anything other than the hardware that Apple gives that OK for to run OS.  In doing so Apple created a very strong brand because something other than the look and feel of the OS but the hardware as well gave Mac a somewhat, transcendental experience that worked for some but not so much for more sophisticated users that were trying to implement a platform on the cheap.

Windows provided that experience by creating a platform that pretty much worked on whatever hardware you wanted to, so you could slum it out a bit.  Yet Windows is still for the most part expensive software and is often bloated so you still need expensive hardware to get around efficiently, so no, still not a viable solution.  So now here comes Sun with OpenSolaris, and critics seem to think that Sun should have gotten behind Linux, like everyone else has, but no, uh uh.

The smartest thing Sun ever could have done was to avoid getting behind the Open Source product, like everyone else in information technology had digressed towards doing, and offer their own product.

Who cares if big corporations are behind an open source product.  When I run Ubuntu or Fedora yeah I know large corporations are behind them and I may or may not have to pay for support.  I definitely have to pay for support for Red Hat’s enterprise product, and that is okay, because I would much rather an IT department actually pay for someone well trained on how to help them than to be searching and pecking around Google looking for help.

Sun is doing everything for free on the surface, taking a loss here or there and redeveloping their flagship product into a free OS for x86 architecture, and it is a beautiful thing.  Who really cares that it has a fraction of the packages that Ubuntu has; most of those packages you will never use, never have a need for and offer no real added value to the OS!  Yeah Microsoft offers a lot of added features to, well all of their products, as well so who really cares.  Give me what I want, what I really need and nothing else!  Yet before you think I’m working for Sun or are just a fanboy I still have a few concerns though.

Where is the marketing of this product!  Are hobbysts going to be the guinea pigs here or is this product simply not ready for prime time.  People found out about Open Office the hard way but I can tell you this; it does what I need for it to do effectively without a lot of hassle.  I’m not out looking for something off of the new interface ribbon and it does the job done simply without a lot of hassle or configuration.

Can we expect the same from OpenSolaris?  Will it load up without a lot of configuration will it get it’s own interface, rather than ripping the look and feel of Ubuntu and will Sun integrate a two tiered support approach?  If I want to have a go at it I can check around in the forums, as I often do with Ubuntu, but if I need that extra level of support I can actually pick up the phone and call someone?  If Sun can offer a comprehensive offering and build on what they are doing with OpenSolaris there may finally be a viable answer to Microsoft on the desktop.

Again, Linux requires people to endure the abuse, narcissism, and straight up misanthropic view of geeks when it comes to support on-line.  Linux often needs to be configured, in which the best way is often through cutting and pasting code but people may want to actually click on some buttons here or there to get it work.  Finally, Linux is fragmented and there aren’t any clear answers on which distribution is better than the next, which interface to go with (KDU or Gnome), which kernel, and so on and so forth.  These are the known obstacles and the inaccessibility that stands between people who know absolutely nothing about computers and Linux.

IBM is behind Linux, as are a bunch of other companies, but for serious use in the enterprise not for playing solitaire at home.  So will Sun finally offer the olive branch to laymen at home who just want to turn the computer on and do something simple without paying for something?  The opportunity is there, but can Sun actually find a way to monetize OpenSolaris to some degree?  People still think that if you aren’t paying something that the technology is worthless.   So far Linux hasn’t done that great of a job of changing anyone’s opinion, doesn’t have any real incentive to do so financial or otherwise and doesn’t appear to be doing so at the end of the day.  But the bottom line remains; consumers need an efficient OS without a lot of the bloat that works that they do not have to maintain through antivirus software that doesn’t get even slower as time passes by.  They need something that is straight and to the point; here’s hoping that Sun finally gives that to them.


Hopefully you all are enjoying Gutsy Gibbon! I have to admit I’m not that impressed by Compiz-Fusion because I had already played with Beryl a lot before it was part of the default install on 7.4, so it wasn’t anything that new. But the effects are compact and a lot more practical than they are on Vista.

One major advantage of Ubuntu is in the screen savers, which are numerous, there are tens, if not hundreds of them. By comparison Vista has a handful of screen savers worth looking at. Because of the way that Linux works you have probably seen a lot of these same special effects 3 or 4 versions back. If you’re into graphics, you don’t have to obsess over having hardware that supports the latest version of Direct X or anything like that; the system is automatically going to tweak itself to help you get the best out of the hardware.

The bottom line is that you can use Ubuntu to do the majority of what you need to do with the OS with it’s package manager that has over 20,000 programs. You’re lucky to find anything other than the Microsoft Office suite that is guaranteed to work on Vista without a hitch; this alone may sway those on the sidelines to make some hard decisions in the months to come. My only issue with Ubuntu or any version of Linux are the poor virtualization choices out there; from what I can tell VMWare is the only viable solution.


Check out my recently published content on AC:

Does the One Trick Pony Have Anything Else to Offer?


Now this is a true pain in the *ss, what I ended up doing, after 3 and a half hours of monkeying with this app, is adding this line to the MP3 profile in Sound Juicer under the profiles

As you can see, the MP3 profile has been changed so that the MP3 is a default.

Look closely

We forced the d* application to accept the MP3 as a default to keep it from locking us out of the option every time the app was started. If you do not do this, you can see the MP3 option, and edit it, but you will never, ever, be able to choose it. Thanks to Ubuntu fourms on this one, hopefully they will fix it in 7.10

This is the string that you need to insert to the “CD Quality, MP3” profile under “GNOME Audio Profiles”

audio/x-raw-int,rate=44100,channels=2 ! lame name=enc preset=1001 ! xingmux ! id3v2mux

Your stuff probably looks like this

audio/x-raw-int,rate=44100,channels=2 ! lame name=enc mode=0 vbr-quality=6 ! id3v2mux

As you can see the provision for the mp3 codec is there, but it isn’t included into the list. Basically you’re changing the GStreamer pipeline, essentially, it isn’t that the codec isn’t active, but you have to “mount” it, per se; which is the Achilles heel to Windows converts like myself that are used to the OS doing everything on the fly.

7.10 comes out in 11 days, and quite honestly, 7.04 was truly difficult with certain tasks that would be commonplace in Windows or Mac. From what I am to understand the new distro just installs on it’s own so we’ll have to see. Mounting is something that you’ll get used to over time, and having the user configure the software is more of a security measure anyway.


Did you know that a judge ruled that a pirate who was offering free downloads of movies was forced to use Windows because the system monitoring software that was part of his punishment does not run Linux? That is too sweet; too bad the poor bloke has to digress to raising money to buy a license, as if his ad revenue didn’t pay for the privilege …

Tags: ,

While Linux is a free, open source product there is still plenty of opportunity to be made in selling the service of making it easy to use for corporations and end users as it is still a Unix derivative made by programmers for techies. Therefore if you are a prototypical Windows or Mac user the GUI may bring you in, but actually trying to install and use some of the software can be a deal breaker. It is not that the stuff doesn’t work, but there isn’t a straightforward approach to using anything other than Firefox and Open Office.

So when we see an innovative commercial for Linux from the likes of IBM we’re a bit intrigued.

IBM is both selling something that is outside of what we have come to know of them, the archaic corporation that was a relic from the 19th century trying to push OS/2, the PC 2 and other failed, proprietary technologies is now selling an open source product, and they aren’t even making any mention of their consulting services? Actually the commercial I am showing you now goes into a lot more depth as to what Linux is about than the one I had originally watched. As I had suggested in response to that article, it isn’t the fact of them being indirect with what they are selling, because financial services providers sell ambiguity all the time, most notably my favorite discontinued Bank of America commercial, but the idea that Microsoft has gotten behind Linux through Novell is in itself a bit compelling, not the mention the irony of the whole SCO thing.

Linux is not going anywhere, and not just because Vista hasn’t delivered what it promised; this is a different age in computing, while advertising shows the rest of us that some people have “gotten it”, the fact that Linux has effectively brought Unix, an old relic from the 70s, into the computing mainstream is enough of a testament to the resiliency of the product to begin with. It is not just a matter of fine tuning the OS and cleaning it up for the consumer …


There seems to be a lot of confusion about whether or not to implement Vista or Ubuntu for your computing needs, which is something that I would like to clear up. First off, Ubuntu is yet another Unix distribution, unlike Windows, Ubuntu is built off of a familiar, open source kernel that can run any other application for any other OS built off of that kernel, it is not platform dependent. With emulation, Ubuntu can run software for most other OS as well. If you are up to running software for Red Hat or Fedora you are free to do so but you will not receive the technical support from Cannonical’s Open Source community when doing so and the package manager will not assist you in doing so. It is completely at your own risk.

In contrast, a Vista user cannot use applications from earlier versions of Vista; the only slight compatibility is that between the 32 bit and 64 bit versions of the software. There are rare circumstances with XP drivers will work on Vista, but that is about it. Microsoft has not and will not built legacy emulation support into the OS, the goal has always been to advance users forward and to acculturate them to using more sophisticated software, to wean them off of outdated methods of programming. Both OS have the same look and feel, and I actually feel that Ubuntu is on par if not better than Vista when it comes to screen savers, 3d special effects, and the like. Ubuntu has a smaller kernel (the registry to Windows users) than most OS and can effectively with 512 mb of ram or less. You do not need a high powered CPU to run Ubuntu.

When you receive Ubuntu you receive a package manager with over 20,000 programs you can install and run (the majority of which are online that you can download), Open Office, a smooth answer to the Office Suite, and a few games. All updates are done online and web browsing is done through Firefox. Your computer will shut down in 10 to 15 seconds, primarily because Ubuntu does not have thousands of drivers installed into the OS at start up, and doesn’t employ many of the sophisticated security measures and memory management features that Vista does. It is stable though; I haven’t had a virus yet and having different programs and up to 50 tabs open on Firefox is no problem. When it does slow down it is because I am using a memory intensive application like Blender, a 3d modeling software I found. Surprisingly, playing multimedia content, such as streaming video, or playing back CDs, does not slow down the system either.

Ubuntu does not have built in support for floppy disk drives either; and it appears that most peripheral support is done through standard open source means, such as Postscript drivers for printing, so it may not be compatible with peripherals from companies that employ proprietary communication techniques, though almost any HP printer would work well I would assume. The bottom line is if you are a lightweight user that has no reason to do anything other than email, Internet and Word Processing Ubuntu is the OS for you; there is support for anything and everything you would pay for on Windows (if it were not preinstalled), and of course it is free. If you use memory hungry applications on PC and are more of a power user Red Hat or some other flavor of Linux would be good for you if you weren’t interested in using Windows anymore. Anyone using Macintosh will immediately be able to adapt to Ubuntu, for PC there is a greater learning curve, since Mac OS is based off of Debian in the first place …